I occasionally receive a very reasonable question from readers:

Why would the character do that?

Usually, “that” refers to ignoring excellent advice, trusting the wrong person, starting an argument at the worst possible moment, walking directly toward obvious danger, or refusing to say the one sentence that could solve approximately three hundred pages of problems.

These are valid concerns.

I have them too.

Unfortunately, the character is often unavailable for comment because they are busy making the situation worse.

Knowing Better Is Not the Same as Doing Better

If people always made the healthiest, safest, and most logical choice available, most stories would be very short.

The mysterious stranger would say, “Come with me if you want answers.”

The heroine would say, “Absolutely not. You appear dangerous and emotionally unavailable.”

She would go home, lock the door, and get eight hours of sleep.

The end.

Honestly, good for her.

But human beings rarely make decisions using logic alone. We act through fear, grief, pride, hope, anger, loyalty, trauma, desire, and the stubborn belief that this time the obviously bad idea might work out differently.

Characters should too.

A believable bad decision is not random stupidity. It is a choice that makes emotional sense to the person making it—even when the reader can see the disaster waiting on the other side.

Every Choice Reveals Something

I learn more about a character from the mistake they choose than from a paragraph explaining who they are.

Someone who runs toward danger may be brave.

They may also believe their life matters less than everyone else’s.

Someone who refuses help may be independent.

They may also be terrified that needing another person gives that person the power to leave.

Someone who lies to protect the person they love may believe they are being noble.

The person being protected will probably have several opinions about that.

Possibly at high volume.

The decision becomes interesting when it exposes the wound beneath it. The reader may want to grab the character by the shoulders and demand better judgment, but they also understand why better judgment was never really available in that moment.

Flaws Have to Affect the Plot

It is easy to give a character a harmless flaw.

Maybe they are messy. Maybe they drink too much coffee. Maybe they are sarcastic before breakfast.

Relatable.

Those details can make a character feel real, but they are not meaningful flaws unless they cost something.

If I say a character struggles to trust people, that cannot disappear the moment trust would make the plot easier. If someone is terrified of abandonment, that fear should shape how they love, fight, forgive, and occasionally destroy a perfectly good relationship.

A flaw that never creates consequences is mostly decoration.

Real flaws interfere.

They make the character choose badly for reasons that feel completely right to them.

Then they hand the writer a much larger revision problem.

The Reader Should See the Better Choice

There is a difference between a character making a painful mistake and a story making the reader feel manipulated.

The better choice needs to exist.

The character may not be capable of taking it yet, but the reader should be able to see it. That gap creates tension: we know what needs to happen, and we know exactly which part of the character is preventing it.

This is especially effective in romance.

Two people can love each other deeply and still lack the courage, honesty, or self-worth required to build something healthy. Love does not automatically repair every damaged belief a person carries.

It does, however, place those beliefs under extremely inconvenient lighting.

Consequences Are What Make the Choice Matter

I will defend a character’s right to make a terrible decision.

I will not defend the story pretending it was a wonderful one.

Choices need consequences. Trust breaks. Plans collapse. Someone leaves. Someone gets hurt. The character must face what they did instead of being rescued by coincidence three pages later.

That is where growth begins.

Not when the character suddenly becomes perfect, but when they finally recognize the pattern that keeps hurting them—and choose differently when it matters most.

Preferably after making me rewrite several chapters.

They are very committed to the creative process.

I Don’t Want Perfect Characters

Perfect characters do not interest me.

I want people who are trying.

People who carry old damage into new relationships. People who confuse protection with control, silence with strength, and survival with living. People who sometimes know exactly what the right choice is and still cannot make it.

Then I want to see what finally changes them.

Not a lecture.

Not a convenient revelation.

A moment when repeating the old choice costs more than risking a new one.

That is the part I love.

So yes, my characters make terrible decisions.

They make them because they are frightened, loyal, wounded, hopeful, stubborn, and human.

And because apparently none of them are interested in giving me an easy book to write.

Continue Reading

If your favorite part of writing is watching the plan collapse, you may also enjoy When the Story Refuses to Obey.