Three distinct fictional character portraits pinned above an open manuscript on a candlelit writing desk

There is a point in revising a book when I read a scene and realize everyone sounds suspiciously reasonable.

The man who was meant to be an ass offers a thoughtful apology. The woman who feels everything suddenly absorbs a cruel remark with admirable calm. The person who never trusts anyone hands over a secret because the chapter needs to move along.

How lovely for them.

How terrible for the book.

I wanted these people in the same room precisely because they would not handle the same moment the same way. Then I got busy making the scene work and quietly sanded all their edges off. It is a bit like inviting an entire cast to dinner and discovering I have dressed every guest as myself.

The Difficult One Has to Stay Difficult

Sometimes I write a man who is meant to be an ass. That is a decision, not an oversight waiting for revision to correct it.

Maybe he interrupts because he believes his plan is the only safe one. Maybe he knows a softer way to deliver the truth and chooses the blunt version anyway. He can love someone, understand exactly how he hurt them, and still react badly the next time he feels cornered.

This does not mean he can never change. It means change costs him something. A tender speech in chapter twelve cannot erase the habit he spent the first eleven chapters practicing.

When I give him an easy apology simply because I am tired of the argument, I have protected myself from writing the harder scene. He should have to notice the damage, face the person he hurt, and decide whether he values being right more than being close.

He may choose badly.

That was, unfortunately, part of the assignment.

And the Sensitive One Is Allowed to Feel It

Then there is the woman who feels things deeply. The revision temptation here is quieter: I worry she has cried enough, worried enough, taken enough things personally. So I hand her a thick new skin between chapters.

But sensitivity is not a character defect the plot is supposed to cure.

She may hear the strain under a joke that everyone else laughs at. She may remember the precise words from an argument the other person has already forgotten. She may need longer to recover from a betrayal, even after deciding to forgive it.

She can also be perceptive, angry, funny, stubborn, and brave. A sensitive person can walk into danger while fully aware of how frightened she is. Her strength does not require her to stop feeling; it may be the reason she refuses to stop caring.

If I flatten that reaction to make her seem tougher, I lose one of the clearest ways she differs from everyone around her.

The Same Event, Several Different People

One useful check is to put the cast in front of a single bad piece of news.

One character demands facts. One starts making a plan before anyone has finished speaking. One asks who else knows. One notices that the messenger is shaking. The difficult man may insist everyone follow him. The sensitive woman may be the only one who understands why the messenger hesitated.

They are all responding to the same problem, but each response reveals what that person notices, fears, and reaches for first. That difference matters more than giving everyone a distinctive favorite swear word.

It matters in dialogue, too. If I can remove the names from a conversation and have no idea who said what, I probably have more work to do. A voice is not just a vocabulary. It is what someone refuses to answer, what they cannot leave alone, and the particular way they try to protect themselves when the conversation turns uncomfortable.

Keeping Track Without Pinning Them Down

For a large cast, I need reminders. I can note the familiar habits: who retreats into sarcasm, who fills silence, who reaches for reassurance and who distrusts it. Then I check the actual pages.

Did the guarded one become open because something earned that trust? Did the impatient one wait because the person mattered enough to try? Did the sensitive one go quiet because she was hurt, or because I did not want to write her response?

A character can surprise me. They should. But surprise ought to feel like a choice made by that person under pressure, not an emergency personality transplant administered to keep the chapter on schedule.

Sometimes the solution is a rewritten line. Sometimes it is an entire scene in which two people remain inconveniently themselves.

I may wish the ass would be kinder sooner. I may wish the sensitive one could brush something off. The reader may wish that too. Wanting better for them is part of what makes it satisfying when better finally arrives.

Until then, I have to let them disagree, misread each other, feel too much or not enough, and carry their own voices into the room.

They can make my job difficult.

They just cannot all make it difficult in exactly the same way.

Discover more from Anna Gerard

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading